This week's topic is buying cheaper than your competitors. (Without ridiculous high MOQ (minimum order quantity).
Beleive it or not, it is almost always possible to buy cheaper than the price you are being offered, even cheaper than the big dogs. All it takes is some special information which I will show you how to easily obtain. It doesn't matter what product you are dealing with, but in our case it was video game products, so for all practical examples, this is what we will use.
In a world market that is highly competitve, you can always find someone who will "price fight". To get the best price, you just need to tell the vendor one thing. I have tested several different methods with this tactic.
I will go into detail with you about this in my course. Please see chapter 8 in the www.videogamegodfather.com and remember, I am always there for you with my personal coaching if you get stuck. I will be there to help ensure your success.
And remember, it's not only about the money, have fun sticking it to the big dogs and owning your share of the marketplace! I know I did.
How to sell your products online without losing your ass to the competition. Buy cheaper, sell cheaper and spend less in advertising. Even get competitors to pay YOU! How to start your own video game website even with absolutely no knowledge of building a site. Be up and running in a day or two. How to automate large volume selling of video games on eBay and other online marketplaces. It doesn't get any simpler than this. Right now, there are video game sellers making millions per year using these same tricks you will never learn reading their help pages. This alone is easily worth thousands! How to spot niche and sub-niche items and categories. Know what will be hot long before the competition. Step by Step guide from start to sick profits. Get your video game business up and running in a day or two. Simple enough for a third grader to implement. How to get your games in stock and not have to pay a dime upfront without dropshipping. How to make 1000% markups on some items and still undercut all the big stores you've heard of! How to start your business today, with no inventory to buy. Verified and tested dropshipping sources revealed carrying the hottest products in the industry! Proper marketing techniques for video game business. Immediately drive amazing levels of qualified BUYERS to your site! How to keep your customers coming back over and over again spending more each time. How to spot nosey competitors posing as customers and stop them dead in their tracks. How to get your cash flowing in quickly while avoiding costly mistakes. How to negotiate the best prices with your suppliers without being gouged into buying large minimum order quantities. How to buy brand new factory sealed video games for as low as $1.90 How to be quickly approved for all major credit cards to accept payments from your customers even if you have bad credit How to get below wholesale prices. You can buy inventory at a price that other sellers will be interested in buying from you. Get better wholesale prices than the big chain stores from their own suppliers! World's best list of quality, reliable and tested video game dropshippers and wholesale suppliers! The three steps to start your business. All can be done in one day! Start making money tomorrow! *Personal Coaching! I will help you succeed! I will be their every step of the way if you ever need help. Talk either myself or one of my successful students live or through email. I want to make sure you have the best chance for success! * You are only eligible for personal coaching if you place your order within the next 24 hours.
Dianetics / Scientology "Hubbard reveals a deep-seated hatred of women....When Hubbard's Mamas are not getting kicked in the stomach by their husbands or having affairs with lovers, they are preoccupied with AA [attempted abortion]--usually by means of knitting needles." (Gardner 1957: 267). In 1950, Lafayette Ronald Hubbard (1911-1986) published Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health (The American Saint Hill Organization, Los Angeles. All page references here are to this edition.) The book is treated as if it were a holy scripture by Scientologists and they treat it as if it were the cornerstone of their church, their religion, and what they consider to be their science. Hubbard tells the reader that dianetics "...contains a therapeutic technique with which can be treated all inorganic mental ills and all organic psycho-somatic ills, with assurance of complete cure...." He claims that he has discovered the "single source of mental derangement" (Hubbard 6). However, in a disclaimer on the frontispiece of the book, we are told that "Scientology and its sub-study, Dianetics, as practiced by the Church...does not wish to accept individuals who desire treatment of physical illness or insanity but refers these to qualified specialists of other organizations who deal in these matters." The disclaimer seems clearly to have been a protective mechanism against lawsuits for practicing medicine without a license; the author repeatedly insists that dianetics can cure just about anything that ails you. He also repeatedly insists that dianetics is a science. Yet, just about anyone familiar with scientific texts will be able to tell from the first few pages of Dianetics that the text is no scientific work and the author no scientist. Dianetics is a classic example of a pseudoscience.
On page 5 of Dianetics, Hubbard asserts that a science of mind must find "a single source of all insanities, psychoses, neuroses, compulsions, repressions and social derangements." Such a science, he claims, must provide "Invariant scientific evidence as to the basic nature and functional background of the human mind." And, this science, he says, must understand the "cause and cure of all psycho-somatic ills...." Yet, he also claims that it would be unreasonable to expect a science of mind to be able to find a single source of all insanities, since some are caused by "malformed, deleted or pathologically injured brains or nervous systems" and some are caused by doctors. Undaunted by this apparent contradiction, he goes on to say that this science of mind "would have to rank, in experimental precision, with physics and chemistry." He then tells us that dianetics is "...an organized science of thought built on definite axioms: statements of natural laws on the order of those of the physical sciences" (Hubbard, 6).
There are broad hints that this so-called science of the mind isn't a science at all in the claim that dianetics is built on "definite axioms" and in his a priori notion that a science of mind must find a single source of mental and psychosomatic ills. Sciences aren't built on axioms and they don't claim a priori knowledge of the number of causal mechanisms which must exist for any phenomena. Of course, science presupposes a regular order to nature and assumes there are underlying principles according to which natural phenomena work. It assumes that these principles or laws are relatively constant. But it does not assume that it can know a priori either what these principles are or what the actual order of any set of empirical phenomena is. A real science is built on tentative proposals to account for observed phenomena. Scientific knowledge of causes, including how many kinds there are, is a matter of discovery not stipulation. Also, scientists generally respect logic and would have difficulty saying with a straight face that this new science must show that there is a single source of all insanities except for those insanities that are caused by other sources.
There is other evidence that dianetics is not a science. For example, his theory of mind shares little in common with modern neurophysiology and what is known about the brain and how it works. According to Hubbard, the mind has three parts. "The analytical mind is that portion of the mind which perceives and retains experience data to compose and resolve problems and direct the organism along the four dynamics. It thinks in differences and similarities. The reactive mind is that portion of the mind which files and retains physical pain and painful emotion and seeks to direct the organism solely on a stimulus-response basis. It thinks only in identities. The somatic mind is that mind, which, directed by the analytical or reactive mind, places solutions into effect on the physical level" (Hubbard, 39).
According to Hubbard, the single source of insanity and psychosomatic ills is the engram. Engrams are to be found in one's "engram bank," i.e., in the reactive mind." The "reactive mind," he says, "can give a man arthritis, bursitis, asthma, allergies, sinusitis, coronary trouble, high blood pressure, and so on down the whole catalogue of psycho-somatic ills, adding a few more which were never specifically classified as psycho-somatic, such as the common cold" (Hubbard, 51). One searches in vain for evidence of these claims. We are simply told: "These are scientific facts. They compare invariably with observed experience" (Hubbard, 52).
An engram is defined as "a definite and permanent trace left by a stimulus on the protoplasm of a tissue. It is considered as a unit group of stimuli impinged solely on the cellular being" (Hubbard, 60 note). We are told that engrams are only recorded during periods of physical or emotional suffering. During those periods the "analytical mind" shuts off and the reactive mind is turned on. The analytical mind has all kinds of wonderful features, including being incapable of error. It has, we are told, standard memory banks, in contrast to the reactive bank. These standard memory banks are recording all possible perceptions and, he says, they are perfect, recording exactly what is seen or heard, etc.
What is the evidence that engrams exist and that they are "hard-wired" into cells during physically or emotionally painful experiences? Hubbard doesn't say that he's done any laboratory studies, but he says that
in dianetics, on the level of laboratory observation, we discover much to our astonishment that cells are evidently sentient in some currently inexplicable way. Unless we postulate a human soul entering the sperm and ovum at conception, there are things which no other postulate will embrace than that these cells are in some way sentient (Hubbard, 71).
This explanation is not on the "level of laboratory observation" but is a false dilemma and begs the question. Furthermore, the theory of souls entering zygotes has at least one advantage over Hubbard's own theory: it is not deceptive and is clearly metaphysical. Hubbard tries to clothe his metaphysical claims in scientific garb.
The cells as thought units evidently have an influence, as cells, upon the body as a thought unit and an organism. We do not have to untangle this structural problem to resolve our functional postulates. The cells evidently retain engrams of painful events. After all, they are the things which get injured....
The reactive mind may very well be the combined cellular intelligence. One need not assume that it is, but it is a handy structural theory in the lack of any real work done in this field of structure. The reactive engram bank may be material stored in the cells themselves. It does not matter whether this is credible or incredible just now....
The scientific fact, observed and tested, is that the organism, in the presence of physical pain, lets the analyzer get knocked out of circuit so that there is a limited quantity or no quantity at all of personal awareness as a unit organism (Hubbard, 71).
Hubbard asserts that these are scientific facts based on observations and tests, but the fact is there hasn't been any real work done in this field. The following illustration is typical of the kind of "evidence" provided by Hubbard for his theory of engrams.
A woman is knocked down by a blow. She is rendered "unconscious." She is kicked and told she is a faker, that she is no good, that she is always changing her mind. A chair is overturned in the process. A faucet is running in the kitchen. A car is passing in the street outside. The engram contains a running record of all these perceptions: sight, sound, tactile [sic], taste, smell, organic sensation, kinetic sense, joint position, thirst record, etc. The engram would consist of the whole statement made to her when she was "unconscious": the voice tones and emotion in the voice, the sound and feel of the original and later blows, the tactile of the floor, the feel and sound of the chair overturning, the organic sensation of the blow, perhaps the taste of blood in her mouth or any other taste present there, the smell of the person attacking her and the smells in the room, the sound of the passing car's motor and tires, etc" (Hubbard, 60).
How this example relates to insanity or psycho-somatic ills is explained by Hubbard this way:
The engram this woman has received contains a neurotic positive suggestion....She has been told that she is a faker, that she is no good, and that she is always changing her mind. When the engram is restimulated in one of the great many ways possible [such as hearing a car passing by while the faucet is running and a chair falls over], she has a feeling that she is no good, a faker, and she will change her mind (Hubbard, 66).
There is no possible way to empirically test such claims. A "science" that consists of nothing but such claims is not a science, but a pseudoscience.
Hubbard claims that enormous data has been collected and not a single exception to his theory has been found (Hubbard, 68). We are to take his word on this, apparently, for all the "data" he presents are in the form of anecdotes or made-up examples like the one presented above.
Another indication that dianetics is not a science, and that its founder hasn't a clue as to how science functions, is given in claims such as the following: "Several theories could be postulated as to why the human mind evolved as it did, but these are theories, and dianetics is not concerned with structure" (Hubbard, 69). This is his way of saying that it doesn't concern him that engrams can't be observed, that even though they are defined as permanent changes in cells, they can't be detected as physical structures. It also doesn't bother him that the cure of all illnesses requires that these "permanent" engrams be "erased" from the reactive bank. He claims that they aren't really erased but simply transferred to the standard bank. How this physically or structurally occurs is apparently irrelevant. He simply asserts that it happens this way, without argument and without proof. He simply repeats that this is a scientific fact, as if saying it makes it so.
Another "scientific fact," according to Hubbard, is that the most harmful engrams occur in the womb. The womb turns out to be a terrible place. It is "wet, uncomfortable and unprotected" (Hubbard, 130).
Mama sneezes, baby gets knocked "unconscious." Mama runs lightly and blithely into a table and baby gets its head stoved in. Mama has constipation and baby, in the anxious effort, gets squashed. Papa becomes passionate and baby has the sensation of being put into a running washing machine. Mama gets hysterical, baby gets an engram. Papa hits Mama, baby gets an engram. Junior bounces on Mama's lap, baby gets an engram. And so it goes (Hubbard, 130).
We are told that people can have "more than two hundred" prenatal engrams and that engrams "received as a zygote are potentially the most aberrative, being wholly reactive. Those received as an embryo are intensely aberrative. Those received as the foetus are enough to send people to institutions all by themselves" (Hubbard, 130-131). What is the evidence for these claims? How could one test a zygote to see if it records engrams? "All these things are scientific facts, tested and rechecked and tested again," he says (Hubbard, 133). But you must take L. Ron Hubbard's word for it. Scientists generally do not expect others to take their word for such dramatic claims.
Furthermore, to get cured of an illness you need a dianetic therapist, called an auditor. Who is qualified to be an auditor? "Any person who is intelligent and possessed of average persistency and who is willing to read this book [Dianetics] thoroughly should be able to become a dianetic auditor" (Hubbard, 173). The auditor must use "dianetic reverie" to effect a cure. The goal of dianetic therapy is to bring about a "release" or a "clear." The former has had major stress and anxiety removed by dianetics; the latter has neither active nor potential psycho-somatic illness or aberration (Hubbard, 170). The "purpose of therapy and its sole target is the removal of the content of the reactive engram bank. In a release, the majority of emotional stress is deleted from this bank. In a clear, the entire content is removed" (Hubbard, 174). The "reverie" used to achieve these wonders is described as an intensified use of some special faculty of the brain which everyone possesses but which "by some strange oversight, Man has never before discovered" (Hubbard, 167). Hubbard has discovered what none before him has seen and yet his description of this "reverie" is of a man sitting down and telling another man his troubles (Hubbard, 168). In a glorious non sequitur, he announces that auditing "falls utterly outside all existing legislation," unlike psychoanalysis, psychology and hypnotism which "may in some way injure individuals or society" (Hubbard, 168-169). It is not clear, however, why telling others one's troubles is a monumental discovery. Nor it is clear why auditors couldn't injure individuals or society, especially since Hubbard advises them: "Don't evaluate data....don't question the validity of data. Keep your reservations to yourself" (Hubbard, 300). This does not sound like a scientist giving sound advice to his followers. This sounds like a guru giving advice to his disciples.
What Hubbard touts as a science of mind lacks one key element that is expected of a science: empirical testing of claims. The key elements of Hubbard's so-called science don't seem testable, yet he repeatedly claims that he is asserting only scientific facts and data from many experiments. It isn't even clear what such "data" would look like. Most of his data is in the form of anecdotes and speculations such as the one about a patient who believes she was raped by her father at age nine. "Large numbers of insane patients claim this," says Hubbard, who goes on to claim that the patient was "raped" when she was "nine days beyond conception....The pressure and upset of coitus is very uncomfortable to the child and normally can be expected to give the child an engram which will have as its contents the sexual act and everything that was said" (Hubbard, 144). Such speculation is appropriate in fiction, but not in science. Thus, we may say that Scientology is a religion built on a fiction, but what religion isn't?
One of the more controversial fictions of L. Ron Hubbard involves a story about Xenu, an alien leader who lead a contingent of space ships to Earth 75 million years ago. The great leader parked the ships around volcanoes and blew them up. Something of these annihilated aliens remains as a sort of "original sin" to be passed on by humans, causing us continual spiritual harm. The Church of Scientology considers the story of Xenu a piece of "religious writing" on par with the Old Testament.
See also my review of L. Ron Hubbard's The Rediscovery of the Human Soul.
neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) I think the more you want to become more and more creative you have to not only elicit other peoples' (plural) strategies and replicate them yourself, but also modify others' strategies and have a strategy that creates new creativity strategies based on as many wonderful states as you can design for yourself. Therefore, in a way, the entire field of NLP™ is a creative tool, because I wanted to create something new. --Richard Bandler
"..the assumptions of NLP, namely that our cognition, behavior and emotions can be 'programmed' by mimicking the more superficial aspects of those with desirable attributes (for example posture and mannerism) are wrong. The last thirty years of research have simply shown that NLP is bunk.--Steven Novella, M.D.
...after three decades, there is still no credible theoretical basis for NLP, researchers having failed to establish any evidence for its efficacy that is not anecdotal.--GarethRoderique-Davies
Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is one of many self-help programs that emerged in the 1970s and '80s but whose popularity has waned somewhat in recent years. NLP might be seen as a competitor with Landmark Forum, Tony Robbins, and legions of other enterprises promising to teach the masses the key to success, power, health, and happiness.
Robbins is probably the most successful "graduate" of NLP. He started his own empire after transforming from a self-described "fat slob" to a firewalker to (in his own words) "the nation's foremost authority on the psychology of peak performance and personal, professional and organizational turnaround." The founders of NLP, Richard Bandler and John Grinder, might disagree about who is the master authority on the psychology of self-help and success.
NLP seems to have something for everybody, the sick and the healthy, individual or corporation. In addition to being an agent for change for healthy individuals, NLP is also used for individual psychotherapy for problems as diverse asphobias andschizophrenia. NLP also aims at transforming corporations, showing them how to achieve their maximum potential and achieve great success. If you shop around, you'll find NLP Practitioner Certification Training for under $100 and only a couple of days of your time. What is NLP? "NLP is the comprehensive training that covers everything you need to know to succeed (and help others succeed) in any area of life including business, relationships, career and any other area of life."
Who discovered NLP?
NLP was begun in the mid-seventies by a linguist (Grinder) and astudent of mathematics (Bandler) who had strong interests in (a) successful people, (b) psychology, (c) language and (d) computer programming. It is difficult to define NLP because those who started it and those involved in it use such vague and ambiguous language that NLP means different things to different people. While it is difficult to find a consistent description of NLP among those who claim to be experts at it, one metaphor keeps recurring. NLP claims to help people change by teaching them to program their brains. We were given brains, we are told, but no instruction manual. NLP offers you a user-manual for the brain. The brain-manual seems to be a metaphor for NLP training, which is sometimes referred to as "software for the brain." Furthermore, NLP, consciously or unconsciously, relies heavily upon (1) the notion of theunconscious mind as constantly influencing conscious thought and action; (2) metaphorical behavior and speech, especially building upon the methods used in Freud's Interpretation of Dreams; and (3) hypnotherapy as developed by Milton Erickson. NLP is also influenced by the work of Gregory Bateson and Noam Chomsky.
One common thread in NLP is the emphasis on teaching a variety of communication and persuasion skills, and using self-hypnosis to motivate and change oneself. Most NLP practitioners advertising on the WWW make grand claims about being able to help just about anybody become just about anything. Below is an excerpt from a website called The National Board of Professional and Ethics Standards on the wonders of NLP:
NLP can enhance all aspects of your life from improving your relationships with loved ones, learning to teach effectively, gaining a stronger sense of self-esteem, greater motivation, better understanding of communication, enhancing your business or career, bending steel bars in a single bound and an enormous amount of other things that involve the use of your brain.
The National Board of Professional and Ethical standards is not an accredited board, but a name pulled out of the air by a guy in Florida named D. A. "Doc" Brady. Brady says he has three doctorates, but he doesn't say where he got them, and he is certified in NLP. One critic claims he got his doctorates from a diploma mill. Brady doesn't say where he got certified in NLP.
Some advocates claim that they can teach a highly reliable method of telling when a person is lying, but others recognize that this is not possible. One NLP guru, Dale Kirby, informs us that one of the presuppositions of NLP is "No one is wrong or broken." So why seek remedial change? On the other hand, what Mr. Kirby does have to say about NLP which is intelligible does not make it very attractive. For example, he says that according to NLP "There is no such thing as failure. There is only feedback." Was NLP invented by the U.S. Military to explain their "incomplete successes"? When the space shuttle blew up within minutes of launch, killing everyone on board, was that "only feedback"? If I stab my neighbor and call it "performing non-elective surgery" am I practicing NLP? If I am arrested in a drunken state with a knife in my pocket for threatening an ex-girlfriend, am I just "trying to rekindle an old flame"?
Another NLP presupposition which is false is "If someone can do something, anyone can learn it." This comes from people who claim they understand the brain and can help you reprogram yours. They want you to think that the only thing that separates the average person from Einstein or Pavarotti or the World Champion Log Lifter is NLP.
NLP is said to be the study of the structure of subjective experience, but a great deal of attention seems to be paid to observing behavior and teaching people how to read "body language." But there is no common structure to non-verbal communication, any more than there is a common structure to dream symbolism. There certainly are some well-defined culturally determined non-verbal ways of communicating, e.g., pointing the back of the hand at another, lowering all fingers but the one in the middle, has a definite meaning in American culture. But when someone tells me that the way I squeeze my nose during a conversation means I am signaling him that I think his idea stinks, how do we verify whether his interpretation is correct or not? I deny it. He knows the structure, he says. He knows the meaning. I am not aware of my signal or of my feelings, he says, because the message is coming from my subconscious mind. How do we test these kinds of claims? We can't. What's his evidence? It must be his brilliant intuitive insight because there is no empirical evidence to back up this claim. Sitting cross-armed at a meeting might not mean that someone is "blocking you out" or "getting defensive". She may just be cold or have a back ache or simply feel comfortable sitting that way. It is dangerous to read too much into non-verbal behavior. Those splayed legs may simply indicate a relaxed person, not someone inviting you to have sex. At the same time, much of what NLP is teaching is how to do cold reading. This is valuable, but an art not a science, and should be used with caution.
Finally, NLP claims that each of us has a Primary Representational System (PRS), a tendency to think in specific modes: visual, auditory, kinaesthetic, olfactory or gustatory. A person's PRS can be determined by words the person tends to use or by the direction of one's eye movements. Supposedly, a therapist will have a better rapport with a client if they have a matching PRS. None of this has been supported by the scientific literature.* Dr. Michael Heap evaluated some 70 papers on NLP and concluded: "...the assertions of NLP writers concerning the representational systems have been objectively and fairly investigated and found to be lacking."
Bandler's First Institute of Neuro-Linguistic Programming™ and Design Human Engineering™ has this to say about NLP:
"Neuro-Linguistic Programming™ (NLP™) is defined as the study of the structure of subjective experience and what can be calculated from that and is predicated upon the belief that all behavior has structure....Neuro-Linguistic Programming™ was specifically created in order to allow us to do magic by creating new ways of understanding how verbal and non-verbal communication affect the human brain. As such it presents us all with the opportunity to not only communicate better with others, but also learn how to gain more control over what we considered to be automatic functions of our own neurology."*
We are told that Bandler took as his first models Virginia Satir ("The Mother of Family System Therapy"), Milton Erickson ("The Father of Modern Hypnotherapy") andFritz Perls (who coined the expression 'Gestalt Therapy') because they "had amazing results with their clients." The linguistic and behavioral patterns of such people were studied and used as models. These were therapists who liked such expressions as 'self-esteem', 'validate', 'transformation', 'harmony', 'growth', 'ecology', 'self-realization', 'unconscious mind', 'non-verbal communication', 'achieving one's highest potential'--expressions which serve as beacons to New Age transformational psychology. No neuroscientist or anyone who has studied the brain is mentioned as having had any influence on NLP. Also, someone who is not mentioned, but who certainly seems like the ideal model for NLP, is Werner Erhard. He started est a few miles north (in San Francisco) of Bandler and Grinder (in Santa Cruz) just a couple of years before the latter started their training business. Erhard seems to have set out to do just what Bandler and Grinder set out to do: help people transform themselves and make a good living doing it. NLP and est also have in common the fact that they are built up from a hodgepodge of sources in psychology, philosophy, and other disciplines. Both have been brilliantly marketed as offering the key to success, happiness, and fulfillment to anyone willing to pay the price of admission. Best of all: no one who pays his fees fails out of these schools!
the ever-evolving Bandler
When one reads what Bandler says, it may lead one to think that some people sign on just to get the translation from the Master Teacher of Communication Skills himself:
One of the models that I built was called strategy elicitation which is something that people confuse with modeling to no end. They go out and elicit a strategy and they think they are modeling but they don't ask the question, "Where did the strategy elicitation model come from?" There are constraints inside this model since it was built by reducing things down. The strategy elicitation model is always looking for the most finite way of accomplishing a result. This model is based on sequential elicitation and simultaneous installation.
Many would surely agree that with communication like this Bandler must have a very special code for programming his brain.
Bandler claims he keeps evolving. To some, however, he may seem mainly concerned with protecting his economic interests by trademarking his every burp. He seems extremely concerned that some rogue therapist or trainer might steal his work and make money without him getting a cut. One might be charitable and see Bandler's obsession with trademarking as a way to protect the integrity of his brilliant new discoveries about human potential (such as charisma enhancement) and how to sell it. Anyway, to clarify or to obscure matters--who knows which?-- what Bandler calls the real thing can be identified by a license and the trademark™ from The Society of Neuro-Linguistic Programming™. However, do not contact this organization if you want detailed, clear information about the nature of NLP, or DHE (Design Human Engineering™ (which will teach you to hallucinate designs like Tesla did), or PE (Persuasion Engineering™) or MetaMaster Track™, or Charisma Enhancement™, or Trancing™, or whatever else Mr. Bandler and associates are selling these days. Mostly what you will find on Bandler's page is information on how to sign up for one of his training sessions. For example, you can get 6 days of training for $1,800 at the door ($1,500 prepaid). What will you be trained in or for? Bandler has been learning about "the advancement of human evolution" and he will pass this on to you. For $1,500 you could have taken his 3-day seminar on Creativity Enhancement (where you could learn why it's not creative to rely on other people's ideas, except for Bandler's).
Grinder and corporate NLP
John Grinder, on the other hand, has gone on to try to do for the corporate world what Bandler is doing for the rest of us. He has joined Carmen Bostic St Clair in endorsing an organization called Quantum Leap, "an international organisation dealing with the design and implementation of cross cultural communication systems." Like Bandler, Grinder claims he has evolved new and even more brilliant "codes".
...the New Code contains a series of gates which presuppose a certain and to my way of thinking appropriate relationship between the conscious and unconscious parts of a person purporting to train or represent in some manner NLP. This goes a long way toward insisting on the presence of personal congruity in such a person. In other words, a person who fails to carry personal congruity will in general find themselves unable to use and/or teach the New Code patterns with any sort of consistent success. This is a design I like very much - it has the characteristic of a self-correcting system.
It may strike some people that terms like "personal congruity" are not very precise or scientific. This is probably because Grinder has created a "new paradigm". Or so he says. He denies that his and Bandler's work is an eclectic hodgepodge of philosophy and psychology, or that it even builds from the works of others. He believes that what he and Bandler did was "create a paradigm shift."
The following claim by Grinder provides some sense of what he thinks NLP is:
My memories about what we thought at the time of discovery (with respect to the classic code we developed - that is, the years 1973 through 1978) are that we were quite explicit that we were out to overthrow a paradigm and that, for example, I, for one, found it very useful to plan this campaign using in part as a guide the excellent work of Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) in which he detailed some of the conditions which historically have obtained in the midst of paradigm shifts. For example, I believe it was very useful that neither one of us were qualified in the field we first went after - psychology and in particular, its therapeutic application; this being one of the conditions which Kuhn identified in his historical study of paradigm shifts. Who knows what Bandler was thinking?
One can only hope that Bandler wasn't thinking the same things that Grinder was thinking, at least with respect to Kuhn's classic text. Kuhn did not promote the notion that not being particularly qualified in a scientific field is a significant condition for contributing to the development of a new paradigm in science. Furthermore, Kuhn did not provide a model or blueprint for creating paradigm shifts! His is an historical work, describing what he believed to have occurred in the history of science. Nowhere does he indicate that a single person at any time did, or even could, create a paradigm shift in science. Individuals such as Newton or Einstein might provide theories which require paradigm shifts for their theories to be adequately understood, but they don't create the paradigm shifts themselves. Kuhn's work implies that such a notion is preposterous.
Grinder and Bandler should have read Kant before they set off on their quixotic pursuit. Kant's "Copernican revolution" might be considered a paradigm shift by Bandler and Grinder, but it is not what Kuhn was talking about when he was describing the historical development of scientific theories. Kuhn restricted his concern to science. He made no claim that anything similar happens in philosophy and he certainly did not imply that anything NLP did, or is doing, constitutes a paradigm shift. Kuhn claimed that paradigm shifts occur over time when one theory breaks down and is replaced by another. Scientific theories break down, he claimed, when new data can't be explained by the old theories or when they no longer explain things as well as some newer theory. What Bandler and Grinder did was not in response to any crisis in theory in any scientific field and so cannot even be considered as contributing to a paradigm shift much less being one itself.
What Grinder seems to think Kuhn meant by "paradigm shift" is something like a gestalt shift, a change in the way we look at things, a change in perspective. Kant might fit the bill for this notion. Kant rejected the old way of doing epistemology, which was to ask 'how can we bring ourselves to understand the world?' What we ought to ask, said Kant, is 'how is it possible that the world comes to be understood by us?' This was truly a revolutionary move in the history of philosophy, for it asserted that the world must conform to the conditions imposed on it by the one experiencing the world. The notion that one has the truth when one's mind conforms with the world is rejected in favor of the notion that all knowledge is subjective because it is impossible without experience which is essentially subjective. Copernicus had said, in essence, let's see how things look with the Sun at the center of the universe, instead of the Earth. Kant said, in essence, let's examine how we know the world by assuming that the world must conform to the mind, rather than the mind conform to the world. Copernicus, however, could be considered as contributing to a paradigm shift in science. If he were right about the earth and other planets going around the sun rather than the sun and the other planets going around the earth--and he was--then astronomers could no longer do astronomy without profound changes in their fundamental concepts about the nature of the heavens. On the other hand, there is no way to know if Kant is right. We can accept or reject his theory. We can continue to do philosophy without being Kantians, but we cannot continue to do astronomy without accepting the heliocentric hypothesis and rejecting the geocentric one. What did Grinder and Bandler do that makes it impossible to continue doing psychology or therapy or semiotics or philosophy without accepting their ideas? Nothing.
Do people benefit from NLP?
While I do not doubt that many people benefit from NLP training sessions, there seem to be several false or questionable assumptions upon which NLP is based. Their beliefs about the unconscious mind, hypnosis and the ability to influence people by appealing directly to the subconscious mind are unsubstantiated. All the scientific evidence which exists on such things indicates that what NLP claims is not true. You cannot learn to "speak directly to the unconscious mind " as Erickson and NLP claim, except in the most obvious way of using the power of suggestion.
NLP claims that its experts have studied the thinking of great minds and the behavior patterns of successful people and have extracted models of how they work. "From these models, techniques for quickly and effectively changing thoughts, behaviors and beliefs that get in your way have been developed."* But studying Einstein's or Tolstoy's work might produce a dozen "models" of how those minds worked. There is no way to know which, if any, of the models is correct. It is a mystery why anyone would suppose that any given model would imply techniques for quick and effective change in thoughts, actions and beliefs. I think most of us intuitively grasp that even if we were subjected to the same experiences which Einstein or Tolstoy had, we would not have become either. Surely, we would be significantly different from whom we've become, but without their brains to begin with, we would have developed quite differently from either of them.
It seems that NLP develops models which can't be verified, from which it develops techniques which may have nothing to do with either the models or the sources of the models. NLP makes claims about thinking and perception which do not seem to be supported by neuroscience. This is not to say that the techniques won't work. They may work and work quite well, but there is no way to know whether the claims behind their origin are valid. Perhaps it doesn't matter. NLP itself proclaims that it is pragmatic in its approach: what matters is whether it works. However, how do you measure the claim "NLP works"? I don't know and I don't think NLPers know, either. Anecdotes and testimonials seem to be the main measuring devices. Unfortunately, such a measurement may reveal only how well the trainers teach their clients to persuade others to enroll in more training sessions.
If you don't trust me, take a look at:
Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration?
Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?
NLP – training’s shameful, fraudulent cult (for what it's worth, I would not classify NLP as a cult, but devotion to Bandler might seem so to some critics)
Neuro Linguistic Programming: Mental health veterans therapy fear
and the Wikipedia article on NLP, which is much more thorough than the SD entry.
postscript: On a more cheerful note, Bandler has sued Grinder for millions of dollars. Apparently, the two great communicators and paradigm innovators couldn't follow their own advice or perhaps they are modeling their behavior after so many other great Americans who have found that the most lucrative way to communicate is by suing someone with deep pockets. NLP is big on metaphors and I doubt whether this nasty lawsuit is the kind of metaphor they want to be remembered by. Is Bandler's action of putting a trademark on half a dozen expressions a sign of a man who is simply protecting the integrity of NLP or is it a sign of a greedy megalomaniac?
13 Secrets for Finding Cheaper AirfareThe cheapest flights are 3 p.m. on Tuesdays. Can't make that? Try these insider booking tips. If you're flying in the U.S., book airfare about seven weeks before your departure to find the best deals.
By Holly JohnsonOct. 10, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. EDT+ More
With the holiday travel season just around the corner, you’re probably wondering how you can get in on a good deal. After all, airfare is undoubtedly one of the most expensive components of any domestic or international travel plan, and prices can vary wildly at times – from manageable to downright cost-prohibitive. The good news is, there are still a few secrets left when it comes to finding airfare you can afford. And, even better, the hassle of searching might be less labor intensive than you ever realized.
If you’re searching for airfare you can truly afford, try these simple tips before pulling the trigger:
Book 49 days in advance. CheapAir.com combed through data on over 11,000 domestic flights to discover the optimum number of days in advance you should book airfare. According to the numbers, the sweet spot for most airfare is around 49 days, or seven weeks, in advance.
Book further out around the holidays. The same CheapAir.com study from last year showed that the optimum booking time was slightly earlier for peak travel times. For example, the cheapest flights around Thanksgiving were booked 96 days, or 14 weeks, in advance.
Fly on Tuesday, Wednesday or Saturday. According to FareCompare.com, the cheapest days to fly in the U.S. are the days less popular with consumers. And apparently, those days are Tuesday, Wednesday and Saturday.
Avoid popular flying days. The concept of supply and demand applies to many things, including airfare. That’s why flying on popular flying days, such as Friday or Sunday, will set you back more. If you want to save, avoid these days and opt for the less popular travel days instead.
Consider flying very early … or very late. Most people don’t want to fly at the crack of dawn or past their bedtime. Because of this, early and late flights are typically far cheaper than flights during normal business hours.
Book your flight on a Tuesday. FareCompare.com reports that the cheapest flights are typically at 3 p.m. on Tuesdays. Even if you don’t book your flight then, it never hurts to look.
Book two one-way flights. Round-trip flights are typically cheaper to book, but that isn’t always the case. Before you sign up for a round-trip flight, price out options for two one-way bookings and consider two different airlines. It might be cheaper that way, and you’ll never know unless you compare.
Accept a layover. Nonstop flights are typically the most convenient – and therefore the most expensive. Instead of choosing the easy option, look for flights with at least one layover. Chances are, this little inconvenience will add up to big savings.
Take advantage of the Internet. The Internet is a treasure trove of information if you’re looking for ways to save on airfare. For starters, use a fare comparing search engine like Kayak.com, or even Google’s Flight Search. Shop around online until you find the best deal.
Follow airlines on social media. Before committing yourself to a certain flight at a specific price, follow your favorite airlines on social media and sign up for their mailing lists. Doing so could mean hearing about insider deals and saving even more.
Sign up for a co-branded rewards credit card. Many airlines offer a co-branded credit card that can help you earn airline miles, free checked baggage and more. They may also offer a hefty sign-up bonus just for signing up and spending a certain amount of money within a specific time frame.
Join frequent flier programs. In addition to getting an airline rewards credit card, you can sign up for that airline’s frequent flier program. This can help you earn free miles for airfare you’re purchasing anyway.
Travel to a different airport. Airfare at airports within 100 miles of each other can vary drastically, making it increasingly important to consider airfare to and from different cities and towns. The cost of driving to an airport an hour away could end up being far less than the difference in your airline ticket.
Trying one of these tips could lead to hundreds of dollars in savings, but applying all of them could mean saving even more. So start searching online for deals, and consider traveling during off-peak times and from airports within 100 miles of your home. And don’t forget to sign up for offers from your favorite airlines; you never know when the perfect deal could come along.
And no matter what, don’t give up. The ideal airfare is out there somewhere – all you have to do is find it. now you have to see it to belive it diabetes cured yes it is curable see more here
Siguiendo en español les decia todo lo que ofrece la net en forma de comentarios son cosas que la verdad les interesa mas a ellos decir que a ti escuchar , como por ejemplo a quien le importa que facebook cambie su politica , que google cambie el algoritmo , nosotros no estamos interesados en eso , yo lo que quiero saber es como se me quite el sarpullido que tengo en un guebo y que encuentre eso gratis en la internet eso es lo que yo le preguntaria a google , lo que pasa es que la gente como esta bien metida en su trabajo internetero piensa que ami me importa , yo la verdad cuando me importa algo mucho y quiero soluciones presisas me dirijo a buscarlas y luego las publico aqui para que la gente no se pierda en un mundo de informacion y desinformacion y pueda disfrutar mas su vida a proposito si quiere poner su anuncio gratis este esta bueno
por andarmela jalando , quiere decir que yo por echador me salio cierto y si fijence que desde que les dije que yo tenia unpegue terrible en los estados unidos pues que creen , que las viejas aca en mexicalpan de las tunas estan requeteentusiasmadas con uno y es como dicen nomas le siembras tantito y crece como la plaga , , otra cosa que queroa comentarles es que tengo un sistema para que todo lo que quieran acer cambios en su forma de ser para mejorar para ser mejor en cualquier area de su vida , pues lo estoy impartiendo por e- mail para todos los que le quieran entrar y es que ya quiero acer algo , con esto de la ciencia de la autoimagen y el cambio para acer cambios en su vida simplemente imaginese estando es ese lugar donde usted ya ha a estado , bueno es asi de facil pero es que detalladamente es mas al punto , quiero decir si usted quiere ser inteligente imaginese siendo inteligente en esa area en donde usted no lo es ahun , me estoy dando a entendr bueno por ahi ba esto de la ciencia del superaprendisaje al estilo anntony roobins pero mejorado con la ciencia d ela autoimagen , ahora vean esto . Memory Lane Meals
"A Collection Of Recipes Celebrating Cozy Meals From Days Gone By" Are you finding the more years that go by, the closer you want to get to the 'Good Old Days?' Reminiscing about days-gone-by is something we do to stay connected, and many of these trips down Memory Lane lead straight to food.
Why does food bring on such wonderful warm fuzzy feelings?
Scientists would say that food, more specifically the aromas of food, go straight to the memory banks in our brain. Memories of home-cooked meals and times spent gathered around the table come flooding back to us; comforting, consoling, and nostalgic.
In these days of the drive-thru and prepackaged ready-to-eat food, it's hard to imagine our young people will have the same memories. That's a shame. And that's why I'm sharing this collection of old fashioned meals with you.
Meals should be served up in big bowls and plates, not cardboard boxes.
Meals should be remembered.
Meals should be celebrated.
Take A Trip With Me Down Memory Lane!
The moment you open Memory Lane Meals, you'll discover why warm, welcoming meals are so important to our daily lives. You'll discover how simple it is to prepare the kinds of meals that we grew up with, even in today's fast-paced world.
You'll discover some really fun memorable meals!
Check Out Some Of The Things
You'll Discover Inside To Get You Cookin' Like the Ol' Days
How to stock your pantry with homemade convenience foods we grew up with WITHOUT all the mysterious additives found in store-bought.
How to enjoy those fancy coffee drinks and other beverages without leaving the comfort of your kitchen table.
Recipes our mothers passed around at school picnics, potlucks, and card clubs for generations.
Those big, bountiful breakfast and brunch dishes that you just don't see today anymore.
Real honest-to-goodness Hors D'oeuvres from back in the day when people actually said the word 'Hors D'oeuvres' – not appetizers, not snacks.
And then there are the desserts... from a time when sweets were considered an honor to have on the table.
With over 400 recipes you are sure to find some new family favorites from our trip down Memory Lane. And you may even discover recipes for some long-lost old favorites!
It's time to Turn Your Memories Into Meals with this easy to download pdf ebook directly accessible to you with just a few clicks!
Don't Wait! Start enjoying the meals you remember with the recipes in this fun cookbook! . Grab your copy right now, today!
Here's How To Order Right Now! ✓ Yes Patti! I Want To Enjoy Home-Cooked Meals With My Family Again Just Like We Used To In The Old Days!
Click the Link Below to Order The Memory Lane Meals Ebook for $12.00
This is A Secure Transaction. Nobody Online Can See Your Data So You Can Place your Order With Confidence.
Don't wait any longer! You can be downloading and enjoying this incredible cookbook within just a few minutes . . . and sharing your own trip down Memory Lane with your family! Creating meal memories is just a click away! I hope you enjoy your trip just as much as I enjoyed sharing mine!
P.S. If you enjoy reminiscing about dinners at home around your kitchen table, this cookbook is the perfect excuse to share those memories, and those meals, with your own family in your very own kitchen. And this cookbook has the recipes you may have forgotten!
P.P.S. Remember, you'll get instant access to this ebook so that you can start enjoying these old fashioned meals right away. There are no extra costs or wait time for shipping. What are you waiting for? Click here to order your copy now!
Haga click para configurar HTML personalizado
Everybody is talking abouth how google all of the suden is getting stinchy to get you in the money roaad and to get in the first rank , hek even to let you blog in some of them google just eliminate you for any friboulus reason but do not sweat and just get used to it eventualy evribody is going to ,either to catch up or just cahnge the search engine for another that do not put so much presures to get in their side , there is so much this efect that in the near future google is bound to becaming the little brother , of the net , , , in the other hand we can make mmoney like google if you do not belive see this link,my search engine also there is help ,12 Steps To Google+ Success - Learn To Grow Your Business & Engage Your Target CustomersGoogle Plus Hangouts Are Constantly Changing - Join In To Keep Up! Members Get At Least 2 New Live Events Every Month, Live Q&a Sessions, Access To The Private Google+ Community And All Hangout Mastery Website Resources!How ToSet Up Google Adwords Campaign By Yourself? 6 Easy Google Adwords Lessons. Set Google Adwords On Your Own!"google Supremacy Is Making Sales Like Sugar Coated Candy"Sit Back And Let Google Send You Big Fat Checks Every Month Until You Tell Them To Stop!Targeted Traffic And More From Google Plus And More. How To Make The Most Of The Latest Social Network On The Web.How To Show Up On Google Is AFundamental SEO Guide For Small Business Owners, Marketers, And Entrepreneurs. Understand The Fundamentals Of Ppc, Adwords, Local Listings, On Page Search Engine Optimization And More.Hard-hitting Secrets, Never Before Revealed...this Is A Hands-on "how To" Ebook, By An Experienced And Very Successful Professional Google Places Submitter. This Ebook Will Show You How To Get Your Business A First Page Listing On Google Places.
Tienda Virtual En CasaGana Dinero Desde Tu Casa, Sin Ser Un Experto Ni Tener Inventario .trafic galore click here
“Como Pase De Ser Un Simple Empleado Endeudado a Dueño de Un Prospero Negocio”
Sabado, 18 de Octubre
Como ya lo sabrás, la situación economica que se vive a nivel mundial (ya no digamos a nivel local), esta pasando por uno de los momentos mas difíciles de la historia y el cheque de nuestro salario que antes alcanzaba para todo, ahora alcanza para poco. Debido a esto todos buscamos una fuente adicional de ingresos, de lo contrario, no estuvieras aquí, ¿cierto?.
Un articulo publicado recientemente en CNN señalo que la tasa de desempleo AUMENTO del 7.2% al 8.1%solamente en america latina. En otro articulo de la misma cadena de noticias, se señalo que el desempleo se vePEOR para el 2010, aún cuando los gobiernos traten de contrarestar este fenomeno que es inminente.
Vivimos con un temor PERMANENTE de ser DESPEDIDOS. Podemos perderlo TODO: nuestra casa, nuestro auto, ser embargados por no pagar nuestras, los impuestos, la luz, el agua, el telefono, hasta ir a la carcel. TenemosTEMOR de que a nuestra familia les falte el pan diario de cada dia y ser avergonzados frente a la sociedad.
Para evitar ser despedidos y formar parte de la estadistica de desempleo, trabajamos a marchas forzadas con horas extras, pasamos de 8 a 12 horas en la oficina haciendo el trabajo de las personas que han sido despedidas y soportando la aburrida rutina diaria de nuestra vida.
¿Aburrida rutina diaria?... No me lo puedes negar, yo también estuve ahí.
Todos los dias me levantaba a las 6 de la mañana, tomaba un baño, desayunaba (cuando podia) y hacia de 30 a 40 minutos en llegar a mi oficina. Entraba a las 8 AM y salia a las 6 o 7 PM (dependiendo de mi jefe), llegaba a mi casa entr 8 y 9, por que a esa hora el trafico esta insoportable. Cuando llegaba a mi casa andaba agoviado, cansado, preocupado por que el dinero no me alcanzaba, no podia pagar completos mis creditos, hipotecas, etc., y por mas que trabajaba me sentia en el mismo hoyo de siempre. Asi que andaba de mal humor, preocupado, no soportaba a mi esposa ni ella a mi, ni decirlo si tienes hijos, parece que todo se vuelve en contra de uno en esas tardes. Y para colmo tenia que ir a dormir por que al dia siguiente tenia que volver a levantarme.
Y al dia siguiente… ocurria lo mismo…
Y al siguiente…
Y al siguiente…
“Como Una Sencilla Idea Me Hizo Pasar de Numeros Rojos a Ganancias en pocos Días”
Asi que un dia tome el valor de iniciar mi "propio negocio". Quise iniciar un negocio físico (tradicional) pero como no tenia tiempo para nada, no era una muy buena idea.
Entonces decidí investigar de que otra manera podía hacerlo por internet, lo que yo queria era un ingreso extra. Semanas después de haber leído y determinado que iba a vender, para mi mala suerte, nada funcionaba, intente vender mil y un productos: licuadoras, tostadoras, hornos, lavadoras, mezcladoras, y todo lo que te puedas imaginar.¿Y adivina que?, nada funcionaba, no vendia absolutamente ni un solo tornillo.
Intente ganar dinero por comision, intente comprar productos y re-venderlos, intente contestar encuestas, ganar dinero por YouTube, intente ganar dinero haciendo clicks en banners, intente multi-nivel, intente vendiendo hospedaje, vendiendo dominios, en fin… infinidad de cosas.
Y todo seguia sin funcionar…
Estaba frustrado, desesperado y desilusionado del Internet. Entonces, se me ocurrio una ultima idea (pues ya no tenia otra y habian pasado meses desde mi primer intento) muy sencilla a la cual le dedicaba de 1 a 2 horas a diario: decidi iniciar mi propia tienda virtual y empeze a vender productos sin ni siquiera tener inventario, total, habia mucho que ganar y nada que perder.
Entonces asi lo hice, primero investigue que es lo que la gente estaba buscando, investigue el comportamiento del mercado, busque un proveedor para ese producto, lo publique en mi tienda virtual y Zas!, a los pocos dias ya tenia una venta.
Perfeccione mi modelo inicial, hice algunos ajustes y empeze un poco más, claro que no fue de la noche a la mañana.Ganaba $30 dolares un dia, $45 otro dia, etc. Hasta que unos meses despues logre ganar lo suficiente para poder renunciar a mi trabajo.
Negocio Tradicional –vs- Negocio Por InternetAntes de continuar, dejame decirte el por que una Tienda Virtual como negocio por Internet es aún MEJOR que un negocio fisico tradicional:
Aquí es donde puedes generar tu riqueza, tener tu propio
NEGOCIO AUTOMATIZADO que PRODUCE INGRESOS CONFIABLES
24/7, trabaja desde casa (o desde cualquier lugar del mundo)
y asegurá el futuro de tu familia...
...hasta si vives una isla aislada SOLAMENTE CON UNA LAPTOP
y conexión a internet!
Descubre los SECRETOS de ADSENSE!
La Estructura de Sistemas de Afiliados y Facebook
y el método Goldman para Posicionar en Google!
There is so much against e mailing but serously is the way many companies have reached his clients , of course you have yo knoe whta are you doing to do that andthis link tells you a litle bit of this phenomenom and to make thigs short i want ypu to recomend my site in google were i put some of my stuff , now days you have to be very smart to be in bizz on the net , better to implement , one thing is for sure if you make it you will make it big time , as hard as it is , once you do it you will do it
Haga click para configurar HTML personalizado
este es el link para que escuche la musica y los videos que he escuchado y me digan que les parece , que les parece he, tambien les quiero comentar que ahorita esta saliendo muchos buenos informacion en you tuve acerca de como acer que su smarthphone funcione mejor vea mas aqui y pues queriendo que no quiere la cosa ya se esta llegando la hora en que nececito acer una decicion acerca de lo que quiero acer con mi vida no s eme quisiera mover a los estados unidos pero n es nomas de moverte es cuestion de donde bas a caer , me dice tilo que el me consigue trabajo llegando a half moon bay cerca de san francisco , mientras tanto quiero dar informacion acerca de como acerla en la vida se dice que google agarra las paginas que tengan contenido mas perro entonces es mejor que nos pongamos las pilas que no, si quiere anseñarse a cantar pegele aqui a veces me canso de poner este siti para que ponga y bajen peliculas aqui bueno hay los guachamos hay luego les pongo mas material aquiMake A Killing With The Only Legal & Real Unlimited Movie Downloads Site! Number One On CB Since 2008.all Moviescapital